Monday, August 03, 2009

Commentary - The Need for Intregity, Collaboration, and Cooperation in the Management of Online Learning Systems

Members of the distance education community are no doubt shocked (and a little embarrassed) by the headlines from Brownsville, Texas in which student employees gained access to the University of Texas - Brownsville learning management system (in this case - Blackboard) to share confidential academic information with fellow students.  In other words - cheating! 

‘Gross academic fraud' at UTB-TSC rocked Office of Distance Education | online, utb, employees - Local - Brownsville Herald A two-month UTB-TSC police investigation found school employees in 2008 had committed "gross academic fraud" after student employees and regular staff used their positions to steal test answers, according to a UTB police report obtained by The Brownsville Herald.  The wrongdoing occurred within the Blackboard Learning System, an online service commonly used at universities. The system allows professors to post tests and course materials for students, teach entire courses online and keep online grade books. Blackboard generally serves to enrich the learning experience; however, former student employees of the school’s Office of Distance Education, the office that manages Blackboard, confessed to a police investigator that they had used the online system to access test answers to help themselves cheat, give the answers to other students, or even to sell.'

While one might be tempted to brush this off with a casual "that could happen to any school", or "if students want to cheat, they'll find a way", I suggest this story provides several object lessons for distance education professionals.

Example 1: It's always hard to find out things the hard way!  In other words, sometimes the only way to figure out you need a better policy or procedure is to have something go wrong.  So while we might be tempted to disparage the folks at UTB, it's pretty clear that they made a mistake and quickly corrected it.

'After weighing the available options, we felt that it was ultimately an academic issue and handling it that way served the university’s educational mission," said UTB attorney Michael Blanchard.  Juliet V. Garcia, the school’s president, when asked why the administration decided to treat the issue as a case of student misconduct rather than pressing criminal charges, responded in a written statement. "After the police investigation and after careful deliberation, we handled the issue under our established procedures for addressing academic misconduct," Garcia wrote.'

Example 2: If it smells like a skunk in the room, you should get out the skunk trap instead of holding you nose.  I suspect the folks at UTB wish they had taken the 'rumors of students misusing the Blackboard system' more seriously.  A general thou-shalt-not-cheat admonition is clearly not enough.

'Distance Education employees said they had heard rumors of students misusing the Blackboard system, and even discovered signs that cheating was occurring, but that they were unsure of how to safeguard against it.  While the school had rules in place — most obviously "no cheating" — university officials admitted there had been a lack of controls to limit access to administrative privileges.
'

Example 3: Policies and best practices are essential (e.g. no password sharing, limited student access to systems).  A code of ethics for employees can go a long way toward setting higher expectations.  With the vast expansion of online systems in education, a number of employees will, and should have access to information about students, faculty and staff.  It's how they use it and the code of ethics surrounding that use which become critical. Nothing wrong with employees managing systems.  Lots wrong with employee abuse of systems they manage.  The old Ronald Reagan phrase comes to mind - 'trust, but verify'. 


"As far as we know, no professors’ pins or usernames were compromised," Blanchard said. But Blanchard said that just because information is confidential, it does not mean no employee should have access to it. " ... Appropriate employees on campus have access to confidential information. If we learn our trust has been breached, we take appropriate action."

I wonder aloud how many other schools are treading on thin ice by not looking at these issues in more detail.  Thankfully, we have a pretty tight security protocol at our institution but there are always areas for improvement.  This example of system abuse should remind us all how important a culture of ethics and responsibility can be.




Monday, July 27, 2009

Innovator's Dilemma and the Diffusion of Innovation

The End in Mind » Deja Vu All Over Again – Blackboard Still Stuck in the Innovator’s Dilemma (Jon Mott's excellent and insightful observations about Blackboard and the status of LMS/CMS products is well worth reading.  I've given a taste of his insight below, but I encourage you to read the entire blog post for it's depth and coherence.
Blackboard can still play a leading role in education. But it needs to think more about end-users and about non-consumers, not just about the universtity administrators who purchase and implement their products. That’s an admittedly tall order for a publicly-traded corporation to take on. But, as Christensen argues, they have to figure out a way to do so if they’re to remain relevant. That’s precisely the innovator’s dilemma.


My comments in response to Jon's excellent article:
Jon, I know your political science background will help you appreciate another relevant concept - the diffusion of innovation.  So, not only do the folks at Bb have an innovator's dilemma, there is the whole question of from whence innovation arises and how is spreads.  The s-curve of how innovation spreads might lead us to flip your model on it's head by suggesting that the innovators are faculty and students, the early adopters are colleagues and peers of the innovators.  I would suggest that, in Bb's defense, their institutional position requires them to be at the opposite end of the innovation curve.  In other words, they are likely to be "laggards" (not my word, but used in the innovation literature).  Conclusion: we expect innovation from Bb but in reality that's not a role they can play. 


Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Twitter Search in Plain English - Common Craft - Our Product is Explanation

From the folks at Common Craft - more cool stuff for simple brains like mine.

Twitter Search in Plain English - Common Craft - Our Product is Explanation

This video uses a metaphor of “Twitterville” to illustrate the opportunities to use the Twitter Search feature to find people and information, read news and discover emerging information.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Future of education lies online

Very insightful commentary from Matt Culbertson at ASU. Here are some excerpts...

Future of education lies online | ASU Web Devil - ASU's Online News Source

The role of the information gatekeeper isn’t what it used to be. There’s a diminished role of authority regulating the flow of information and decided what content passes forward —and anyone can be a mass-communicating producer and consumer of content.

Every industry and institution that functions as an information provider is facing more competition than ever before.

In some ways, the same forces driving newspapers and more isolated cases of traditional media bankrupt threaten the university model.

An April commentary article in the Chronicle of Higher Education pointed out that universities have a weakness with large, low-level undergraduate classes. An increasing number of online classes from for-profit groups threatens that revenue source.

The author cited the regulatory wall of college accreditation to bar competition, but private sector competition to the university environment is on a growth trend — more students than ever take classes with for-profit institutions like Kaplan University and the University of Phoenix.

A 2008 study by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation found that 22 percent of American college students took at least one online class in the fall 2007 semester.

But universities should be wary of the Internet’s tendency to kill business models — newspapers, recording labels and soon maybe the rest of traditional media demonstrate that lesson.


Shared via AddThis

Monday, June 01, 2009

The End in Mind » I’ve Seen the Future and the Future is Us (Using Google)

The End in Mind » I’ve Seen the Future and the Future is Us (Using Google)
From Jon Mott at BYU, a discussion of the new search and semantic web tools put well into context. Of particular note:

As we adopt and adapt tools like Twitter and Google Wave to our purposes as learning technologists, we have to change the way we think about managing facilitating learning conversations. We can no longer be satisfied with creating easy to manage course websites that live inside moated castles. We have to open up the learning process and experience to leverage the vastness of the data available to us and the power of the crowd, all the while remembering that learning is fundamentally about individuals conversing with each other about the meaning and value of the data they encounter and create. Technologies like Google Wave are important, not in and of themselves, but precisely because they force us to remember this reality and realign our priorities and processes to match it.